PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1994Econometrica4,161 citations

Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects

View Full Paper
GIGuido W. ImbensJAJoshua D. Angrist

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the conditions required for identifying average treatment effects with instrumental variables.
  • Investigated conditions for valid instruments in estimating average treatment effects.
  • Demonstrated the need for both an instrument and a participation status condition for identification.
  • Derived the probability limit of the standard IV estimator in relation to local average treatment effects.
  • Established that valid instruments alone do not guarantee identification of average treatment effects.
  • Showed that the appropriate combination of instruments and conditions allows for estimation of local average treatment effects.
  • Derived estimator's probability limit as a weighted average of local average treatment effects.

Abstract

We investigate conditions sufficient for identification of average treatment effects using instrumental variables. First we show that the existence of valid instruments is not sufficient to identify any meaningful average treatment effect. We then establish that the combination of an instrument and a condition on the relation between the instrument and the participation status is sufficient for identification of a local average treatment effect for those who can be induced to change their participation status by changing the value of the instrument. Finally we derive the probability limit of the standard IV estimator under these conditions. It is seen to be a weighted average of local average treatment effects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Imbens et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbef3cd60f0b8828835c8fhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2951620
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper