PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2005Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres126 citationsOpen Access

Sensitivity of atmospheric CO2 inversions to seasonal and interannual variations in fossil fuel emissions

View Full Paper
KGK. R. GurneyYCYuhan ChenTMT. Mäki

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Estimates of fossil fuel CO 2 are a critical component in atmospheric CO 2 inversions. Rather than solving for this portion of the atmospheric CO 2 budget, inversions typically include estimates of fossil fuel CO 2 as a known quantity. However, this assumption may not be appropriate, particularly as inversions continue to solve for fluxes at reduced space and timescales. In this study, two different alterations are made to widely used fossil fuel CO 2 emissions estimates, and these altered emissions are run through a series of atmospheric inversion experiments. The first alteration is the inclusion of a seasonal cycle which depends upon both season and latitude. The other alteration is the inclusion of year‐by‐year changes in the spatial distribution of fossil fuel CO 2 emissions. All but the interannual inversion experiments are run with three models from the TransCom 3 atmospheric inversion intercomparison. These three models span the key components of atmospheric transport and hence can be expected to capture the range of potential bias caused by assumed fossil fuel CO 2 emission estimates when interacting with transport processes. Key findings include the lack of seasonal rectification of the seasonally varying fossil fuel CO 2 emissions in the annual mean. Examination of monthly fluxes in the seasonal inversion, however, indicates that significant bias is likely occurring and may be as large as 50% of the residual flux during certain times of the year. In this study, interannual variations were little effected by shifts in the spatial pattern of fossil fuel CO 2 emissions. However, as the spatial scale of inversions is reduced, potential bias will likely increase.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gurney et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbf275d60f0b8828835d8bhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005373
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TransCom 3 CO2 inversion intercomparison: 1. Annual mean control results and sensitivity to transport and prior flux information2003 · 327 citations
  2. 2Influence of transport uncertainty on annual mean and seasonal inversions of atmospheric CO2 data2002 · 117 citations
  3. 3Simulating the Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Distribution with a Three-Dimensional Tracer Model1986 · 45 citations
  4. 4A synthesis inversion of the concentration and delta13 C of atmospheric CO21995 · 236 citations
  5. 5A three dimensional model of atmospheric CO_2 transport based on observed winds: 4. Mean annual gradients and interannual variations.1989 · 119 citations