This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study demonstrated that overall ambulation and anatomic-functional level were significantly better among our large postnatal cohort, as well as having significantly fewer complications to both fetus and mother, when compared to the postnatal cohort of the MOMS trial. Our finding that ambulatory ability declined significantly with age in this patient population is worrisome for the long-term outcomes of the MOMS cohorts, especially given the high rates of cord tethering at early ages within the prenatal cohort. These findings suggest that the perceived benefits of prenatal closure over postnatal closure may not be as substantial as presented in the original trial, with the durability of results still remaining a concern.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weaver et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: