Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present results from research exploring the effect of sharing virtual gaze and pointing cues in a wearable interface for remote collaboration. A local worker wears a Head-mounted Camera, Eye-tracking camera and a Head-Mounted Display and shares video and virtual gaze information with a remote helper. The remote helper can provide feedback using a virtual pointer on the live video view. The prototype system was evaluated with a formal user study. Comparing four conditions, (1) NONE (no cue), (2) POINTER, (3) EYE-TRACKER and (4) BOTH (both pointer and eye-tracker cues), we observed that the task completion performance was best in the BOTH condition with a significant difference of POINTER and EYETRACKER individually. The use of eye-tracking and a pointer also significantly improved the co-presence felt between the users. We discuss the implications of this research and the limitations of the developed system that could be improved in further work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: