Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 16, 2017Open Access

The Validity of the Tool “statcheck” in Discovering Statistical Reporting Inconsistencies

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MNMichèle B. NuijtenMAMarcel A. L. M. van AssenCHChris Hartgerink

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Nuijten et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc625aa1baf05934e52d61https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcxaj
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)2015 · 553 citations
  2. 2Outlier Removal and the Relation with Reporting Errors and Quality of Psychological Research2014 · 108 citations
  3. 3Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity1994 · 2,092 citations
  4. 4Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity.2015 · 465 citations
  5. 5The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals2011 · 383 citations