Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The voltammetry and kinetics of the Ag|Ag+ system (commonly used as a reference electrode material in both protic/aprotic and RTIL solvents) was studied in the room-temperature ionic liquid N-butyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, [C4mpyrr][NTf2] on a 10 μm diameter Pt electrode. For the three silver salts investigated (AgOTf, AgNTf2, and AgNO3, where OTf- = trifluoromethanesulfonate, NTf2- = bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, and NO3- = nitrate), the voltammetry gave rise to a redox couple characteristic of a “deposition/stripping” process at the platinum electrode surface. Using potential step chronoamperometry, the diffusion coefficients of AgOTf, AgNTf2, and AgNO3 were found to be 1.05, 1.17, and 5.00 × 10-11 m2 s-1. All three voltammograms were theoretically modeled to reveal surprisingly slow standard electrochemical rate constants, k0, of 2.0, 1.5, and 0.19 × 10-4 cm s-1 respectively for the Ag+|Ag0 couple. As a potentially faster alternative to the Ag|Ag+ system, the voltammetry and kinetics of the TMPD|TMPD+• system (where TMPD = N,N,N ‘,N‘-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine) was also studied, using neutral TMPD and two TMPD radical cation salts, with BF4- and NTf2- counter anions. Diffusion coefficients for TMPD, TMPD+•BF4-, and TMPD+•NTf2- were calculated to be 1.84, 1.35, and 1.43 × 10-11 m2 s-1 respectively, and a k0 value of 2.6−2.8 × 10-3 cm s-1 was obtained from theoretical fitting of the cyclic voltammetry. This number is an order of magnitude larger than that for the Ag|Ag+ system, allowing for the suggestion that the TMPD|TMPD+• system may be more suitable than the Ag|Ag+ system as a redox couple for use in reference electrodes for ionic liquids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rogers et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: