This model explores transitionary dark energy behavior in cosmological data, suggesting new implications.
We propose the metastable emergent dark energy (MEDE) model, a novel phenomenological extension of the phenomenological and generalized emergent dark energy frameworks, in which dark energy exhibits a transitionary behavior, appearing at late times and vanishing toward the future. This model naturally enables a smooth crossing of the phantom dividing line in the dark energy equation of state, as hinted at by recent observations. The MEDE model is defined by a hyperbolic tangent dark energy equation of state w ( z ) = − 1 − Δ tanh [ log 10 ( ( 1 + z ) / ( 1 + z t ) ) ] , introducing only two free parameters—the transition redshift z t and the variation amplitude Δ—allowing both the emergent and transitionary behavior of dark energy. We constrain the MEDE model using a combined dataset of Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, and different compilations of Type Ia supernovae, obtaining z t = 0.42 5 − 0.120 + 0.084 and Δ = 0.8 7 − 0.35 + 0.29 (for CMB+DESI+PantheonPlus), indicating a statistically significant deviation from the cosmological constant. Statistical comparisons show that the MEDE model is preferred over ΛCDM by the combined dataset, with ΔDIC MEDE−ΛCDM = −9.29. The MEDE model performs comparably to the Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) dynamical dark energy parameterization (ΔDIC MEDE −CPL = 0.74), with no strong statistical distinction from CPL using current data. Notably, MEDE preserves the success of ΛCDM in describing early-universe physics and naturally accommodates the phantom-crossing signature indicated by the latest low-redshift observations. The MEDE scenario provides a compelling dark energy phenomenology that may guide us toward interesting theoretical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: