PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología5 citationsOpen Access

Metastability in Emergent Dark Energy: A New Framework Confronting Cosmological Observations

View Full Paper
XLXiaolei LiTLTonghua LiuTLTian-Nuo Li

Key Points

  • To introduce and constrain the metastable emergent dark energy model using cosmological observations.
  • Develop the MEDE model with a hyperbolic tangent equation of state.
  • Utilize datasets from Planck CMB, DESI DR2, and Type Ia supernovae for constraints.
  • Analyze statistical significance compared to the standard ΛCDM model.
  • Determine transition redshift zt = 0.42 with statistical constraints.
  • Find variation amplitude Δ = 0.8, indicating significant deviation from ΛCDM.
  • Statistical analysis favors MEDE over ΛCDM by a ΔDIC of -9.29.

Abstract

Abstract We propose the metastable emergent dark energy (MEDE) model, a novel phenomenological extension of the phenomenological and generalized emergent dark energy frameworks, in which dark energy exhibits a transitionary behavior, appearing at late times and vanishing toward the future. This model naturally enables a smooth crossing of the phantom dividing line in the dark energy equation of state, as hinted at by recent observations. The MEDE model is defined by a hyperbolic tangent dark energy equation of state w ( z ) = − 1 − Δ tanh log 10 ( ( 1 + z ) / ( 1 + z t ) ) , introducing only two free parameters—the transition redshift z t and the variation amplitude Δ—allowing both the emergent and transitionary behavior of dark energy. We constrain the MEDE model using a combined dataset of Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) DR2 baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, and different compilations of Type Ia supernovae, obtaining z t = 0.42 5 − 0.120 + 0.084 and Δ = 0.8 7 − 0.35 + 0.29 (for CMB+DESI+PantheonPlus), indicating a statistically significant deviation from the cosmological constant. Statistical comparisons show that the MEDE model is preferred over ΛCDM by the combined dataset, with ΔDIC MEDE−ΛCDM = −9.29. The MEDE model performs comparably to the Chevallier–Polarski–Linder (CPL) dynamical dark energy parameterization (ΔDIC MEDE −CPL = 0.74), with no strong statistical distinction from CPL using current data. Notably, MEDE preserves the success of ΛCDM in describing early-universe physics and naturally accommodates the phantom-crossing signature indicated by the latest low-redshift observations. The MEDE scenario provides a compelling dark energy phenomenology that may guide us toward interesting theoretical implications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc874a3afacbeac03e9bd1https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae5a36
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper