PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2026The Journal of Urology0 citations

sPaRT2 – Minimally Invasive Partial versus Radical Nephrectomy for cT2 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A National Matched-Pair Analysis (UroCCR 235)

View Full Paper
RERajâa Et-TouzaniInsermJBJean-Christophe BernhardUniversité de BordeauxTPThomas PrudhommeUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées

Key Points

  • This analysis compares the safety and outcomes of partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with cT2 renal cell carcinoma.
  • Conducted a national matched-pair analysis.
  • Compared outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and radical nephrectomy (RN).
  • Evaluated perioperative morbidity and long-term nephron-sparing benefits.
  • RAPN shown to be safe and functionally superior to RN for selected patients.
  • Higher perioperative morbidity associated with RAPN, yet considered acceptable in expert centers.
  • Long-term benefits from nephron-sparing procedures outweigh perioperative risks.

Abstract

RAPN is a safe and functionally superior alternative to RN for selected patients with cT2 RCC. While associated with higher perioperative morbidity, these risks are acceptable in expert centers and offset by long-term nephron-sparing benefits.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Et-Touzani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc87983afacbeac03e9e39https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000005063
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper