Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physics-informed model predicts surface roughness in Ti-6Al-4V with improved accuracy, suggesting effective parameter integration.
Predicting surface roughness in titanium alloy machining remains challenging due to the nonlinear interactions among process parameters and the small datasets inherent to experimental campaigns. Physics-Informed Symbolic Regression Ensemble (PISRE) is a novel physics-informed ensemble model for Ti-6Al-4V roughness Ra that integrates a physics layer with four log-optimized symbolic branches and an uncertainty-weighted mechanism for dynamic branch confidence. Experiments were conducted following a Central Composite Design yielding 19 runs spanning cutting velocity V_c = 104 – 256 m/min, feed rate f = 0.035 – 0.385 mm/rev, and depth of cut a_p = 0.03 – 0.37 mm. Leave-One-Out cross-validation showed that PISRE achieved RMSE = 0.443 µm and R^2 = 0.915 , outperforming XGBoost (RMSE = 0.657, R^2 = 0.814 ) and Random Forest (RMSE = 0.716, R^2 = 0.778 ) by 32.6% and 38.1% in RMSE respectively. The optimised feed rate exponent ( b ≈ 1.18 ) is physically consistent with Ti-6Al-4V turning literature, and Spearman correlation analysis confirmed feed rate as the sole significant predictor of Ra within the tested window ( r_s = +0.937 , p < 0.001 ). Results show that physics-informed constraints enhance generalization and interpretability in small datasets compared to standard data-driven models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maciel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: