PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 2026Psychology Health & Medicine2 citations

Lesion visibility and localization as predictors of social appearance anxiety in Pemphigus vulgaris: a case–control study

View Full Paper
FKFaruk KurhanİYİbrahim Halil Yavuz

Key Points

  • To investigate how lesion visibility and localization affect social appearance anxiety in Pemphigus vulgaris patients.
  • Compared social appearance anxiety (SAA) between 150 PV patients and 150 matched controls.
  • Participants completed several questionnaires including SAAS, HADS, DLQI, B-IPQ, RSES, and VAS.
  • Performed group comparisons, Pearson correlations, one-way ANOVA, and moderation analysis.
  • PV patients exhibited significantly higher SAA (55.8±10.2) compared to controls (21.3±8.8, p<0.001).
  • SAA positively correlated with anxiety (HADS-A), dermatology-specific quality of life (DLQI), and illness perception (B-IPQ), while negatively correlating with self-esteem.
  • Higher SAA observed with facial, scalp, and neck lesions (ANOVA F(3,146) = 8.02, p<0.001).

Abstract

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV), a chronic autoimmune blistering disorder, frequently affects highly visible regions such as the face, scalp, and upper body, potentially altering body image and increasing social appearance anxiety (SAA). The psychosocial pathways linking lesion visibility and localization to SAA, however, remain insufficiently examined. This analytical cross-sectional case�control study compared SAA levels between 150 PV patients with visible lesions and 150 age- and sex-matched controls, and explored associations between SAA and illness perception, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and dermatology-specific quality of life. Participants completed the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale (SAAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for perceived severity. Group comparisons, Pearson correlations, one-way ANOVA by lesion visibility and location, and moderation analysis (PROCESS Model 1: HADS-A � VAS ? SAAS) were performed. PV patients demonstrated significantly higher SAA than controls (55.8?�?10.2 vs. 21.3?�?8.8; p?0.001). Within patients, SAA correlated positively with HADS-A, DLQI, and B-IPQ, and negatively with self-esteem. General anxiety moderated the relationship between perceived severity and SAA (interaction 0.18, p=0.006), indicating greater distress among highly anxious individuals. Lesion visibility showed a clear gradient, with face, scalp, and neck lesions producing the highest SAA (ANOVA F(3,146) = 8.02, p?0.001). Findings highlight lesion visibility and localization as key determinants of SAA in PV and suggest that integrating psychological screening into dermatologic care may help address elevated appearance-related distress.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kurhan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc88303afacbeac03ea123https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2026.2653105
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper