Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Value-added models (VAMs) are increasingly used to measure school effectiveness. Yet, random variation in school attendance is necessary to test the validity of VAMs and to guide the selection of models for measuring causal effects of schools. In this paper, I use random assignment from a public school choice lottery to test the predictive power of VAM specifications. In VAMs with minimal controls and two or more years of prior data, I fail to reject the hypothesis that school effects are unbiased. Overall, many commonly used VAMs are accurate predictors of student achievement gains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Deming (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: