Experiments assess imitation repertoire improvements in toddlers and preschoolers using Do-See training, suggesting effective educational strategies.
Purpose This paper aims to conduct two experiments testing the effects of a Do-See correspondence training on participant’s gross motor and generalised imitation repertoires. Design/methodology/approach Experiment 1 was the pilot study, where the authors used a nonconcurrent pre- and post-intervention design with an embedded changing-criterion design to evaluate the effects of the Do-See Correspondence training on the imitation repertoires of five developmentally delayed toddlers. In Phase 1, experimenters imitated participants in two-minute sessions and recorded the number of times the participant acknowledged their mimicry. In Phase 2, experimenters continued imitating and recording acknowledgements while interspersing see-do opportunities. In Experiment 2, the authors replicated the pilot study with some modifications to the criterion and procedures with three preschoolers with Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) using a multiple probe across participants’ design. Findings In Experiment 1, all five toddler participants increased their correct gross motor imitation responses, with four demonstrating 100% accuracy for Generalised Imitation (GI) as well. In Experiment 2, all three preschoolers showed improvements in their imitation responses, but only one met the criterion for gross motor imitation. Originality/value Overall, the Do-See correspondence training appeared effective and offered a viable alternative for students who may have difficulty learning from traditional imitation instruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farrell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: