Why the study?
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote clinics, meetings, and investigations to minimise hospital attendance by patients and staff while delivering outpatient arrhythmia care.
The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed a likely permanent shift towards remote clinics and investigations in arrhythmia services, maintaining care quality and safety.
Supports remote arrhythmia outpatient models; leaves open need for prospective trials on long-term safety and equity.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a dramatic impact on the way that medical care is delivered. To minimise hospital attendance by both patients and staff, remote clinics, meetings and investigations have been used. Technologies including hand-held ECG monitoring using smartphones, patch ECG monitoring and sending out conventional Holter monitors have aided remote investigations. Platforms such as Google Meet and Zoom have allowed remote multidisciplinary meetings to be delivered effectively. The use of phone consultations has allowed outpatient care to continue despite the pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a radical, and probably permanent, change in the way that outpatient care is delivered. Previous experience in remote review and the available technologies for monitoring have allowed the majority of outpatient care to be conducted without obviously compromising quality or safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Honarbakhsh et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: