Why the study?
Is current or historical depression associated with signs of atherosclerosis in the general population?
Is current or historical depression associated with signs of atherosclerosis in the general population?
A medical history of depression, but not current depression, is moderately associated with the presence of atherosclerotic plaques, suggesting lasting depression may contribute to arteriosclerosis.
History of depression modestly associates with plaques after adjustment; leaves open causality and need for longitudinal studies.
Objectives To test the vascular depression hypothesis in the general population, we analyzed the association between current depression, medical history of depression, cognitive and somatic depressive symptom dimensions and measures of atherosclerosis [intima–media thickness (IMT) and carotid plaques]. Method We included a representative sample of 5000 participants from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). Depression was assessed by the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and IMT and carotid plaques were measured at both common carotid arteries using an edge detection system. Regression analyses were performed separately for participants with and without cardiovascular disease, adjusting for medical history, cardiovascular risk factors and psychotropic medication. Results Contrary to hypotheses, we found no increased IMT for somatic symptoms of depression; the same was true for depression and cognitive symptoms in the fully adjusted model. Only a moderate relationship between medical history of depression and the presence of atherosclerotic plaques was maintained after correction. Conclusions The relationship between depression and atherosclerosis may be more complex than previously assumed. Although the vascular depression hypothesis was not supported, our results support the hypothesis that lasting depression leads to arteriosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beutel et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: