Why the study?
Pulmonary rehabilitation during hospitalization for AECOPD occurs during a period of disease instability, and its safety and efficacy specifically during hospitalization have not been established.
Does in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation improve functional capacity and quality of life in patients hospitalized with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
Does in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation improve functional capacity and quality of life in patients hospitalized with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
In-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation is safe and effectively improves functional exercise capacity, quality of life, and lower limb strength in patients with AECOPD without prolonging hospital length of stay.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports inpatient PR in AECOPD to improve function and strength without prolonging stay; confirms benefits and warrants broader implementation.
Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) during hospitalization for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) occurs during a period of disease instability for the patient, and the safety and efficacy of PR, specifically during the hospitalization period, have not been established. Objective: The purpose of this review is to determine the safety and efficacy of PR during the hospitalization phase for individuals with AECOPD. Methods: Scientific databases were searched up to August 2022 for randomized controlled trials that compared in-hospital PR with usual care. PR programs commenced during the hospitalization and included a minimum of two sessions. Titles and abstracts followed by full-text screening and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. The intervention effect estimates were calculated through meta-analysis using a random-effect model. Results: A total of 27 studies were included (n = 1,317). The meta-analysis showed that inpatient PR improved the 6-minute-walk distance by 105 m (P < 0.001). Inpatient PR improved the performance on the five-repetition sit-to-stand test by -7.02 seconds (P = 0.03). Quality of life (QOL), as measured by the 5-level EuroQoL Group-5 dimension version (EQ-ED-5L) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, was significantly improved by the intervention. Inpatient PR increased lower limb muscle strength by 33.35 N (P < 0.001). There was no change in the length of stay. Only one serious adverse event related to the intervention was reported. Conclusions: This review suggests that it is safe and effective to provide PR during hospitalization for individuals with AECOPD. In-hospital PR improves functional exercise capacity, QOL, and lower limb strength without prolonging the hospital length of stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moecke et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: