Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 6, 2016The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Comparison of Anatomic Double- and Single-Bundle Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

IKIoannis KarikisNU Hospital GroupNDNeel DesaiApple (Israel)NSNinni SernertNU Hospital Group

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Karikis et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dcc13a89c4deb67d35983bhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515626543
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tear: five year outcome of randomised trial2013 · 488 citations
  2. 2Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) ‐ validation of a Swedish version1998 · 604 citations
  3. 3Health‐Related Quality of Life and Direct Costs in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Single‐Bundle Versus Double‐Bundle Reconstruction in a Low‐Demand Cohort—A Randomized Trial With 2 Years of Follow‐up2012 · 53 citations
  4. 4Cost-Effectiveness of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction2010 · 38 citations
  5. 5Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery2004 · 294 citations