This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The specific role of each fraction of soil C (i.e., particulate [POC] or mineral‐associated organic carbon [MAOC]) in each soil strength mechanism remains unexplored. We investigated the relationships of total organic C and its physical fractions with soil strength of two tropical soils (sandy clay loam [SCL soil ] and sandy clay [SC soil ]). We measured soil strength indicators from oven‐dry aggregates [tensile strength ( σ t )] and some related to soil compaction [precompression stress ( σ p ), compression index ( λ ), and penetration resistance (SPR) at constant matric potential (−100 hPa)]. These soil strength indicators were used as response variables in path analyses to determine direct effects of C, MAOC, and POC mediated by key physical strength inducers (bulk density or water content). Results suggest a C role conferring soil strength verified by positive correlation with tensile strength and SPR increase, positively influenced by MAOC in SCL soil and C/POC/MAOC in SC soil . For SPR, the C effect was mediated by water content or bulk density (i.e., indirect contribution for correlation). Organic C, in turn, showed limited effect on soil compressibility. These findings indicate that increases in soil carbon that enhance aggregate mechanical strength and penetration resistance do not result in reduced soil compressibility (i.e., resistance to compaction). In sandy clay loam soils, MAOC plays a key role in increasing soil strength, whereas all carbon fractions contribute to strength gains with increasing clay content. Thus, while organic carbon can promote beneficial structural stability in the long term, it may also increase SPR, which affects root growth.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lima et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: