When fertilizing with compost, the fate of the nitrogen applied via compost (mineralization, plant uptake, leaching, soil accumulation) is relevant both from a plant‐production and an environmental point of view. In a 10‐year crop‐rotation field experiment with biowaste‐compost application rates of 9, 16, and 23 t ha –1 y –1 (f. m.), the N recovery by crops was 7%, 4%, and 3% of the total N applied via compost. Due to the high inherent fertility of the site, N recovery from mineral fertilizer was also low. In the minerally fertilized treatments, which received 25, 40, and 56 kg N ha –1 y –1 on average, N recovery from mineral fertilizer was 15%, 13%, and 11%, respectively. Although total N loads in the compost treatments were much higher than the N loads applied with mineral fertilizer (89–225 kg N tot ha –1 y –1 vs. 25–56 kg N tot ha –1 y –1 ; both on a 10‐year mean) and the N recovery was lower than in the treatments receiving mineral N fertilizer, soil NO ₃⁻ ‐N contents measured three times a year (spring, post‐harvest, autumn) showed no higher increase through compost fertilization than through mineral fertilization at the rates applied in the experiment. Soil contents of N org and C org in the plowed layer (0–30 cm depth) increased significantly with compost fertilization, while with mineral fertilization, N org contents were not significantly higher. Taking into account the decrease in soil N org contents in the unfertilized control during the 10 years of the experiment, 16 t compost (f. m.) ha –1 y –1 just sufficed to keep the N org content of the soil at the initial level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartl et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: