Summary 1. Modern comparative approaches use model‐based methods to describe evolutionary processes. Generalised least squares calculations lie at the heart of many methods; however, they can be computationally intensive. This is because it is necessary to form a variance–covariance matrix, then to calculate the inverse and determinant of this. 2. Based on an algorithm provided by Felsenstein (American Journal of Human Genetics, 1973, 25, 471), I show how to perform comparative calculations that avoid these computational steps. 3. I apply the method to several problems in comparative analysis, including calculating likelihoods, estimating Pagel’s λ for one or several traits and fitting linear models. 4. R code is provided, which implements the algorithm described. Examples are included to demonstrate the computational gains possible for several commonly used comparative methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert P. Freckleton (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: