This special issue revisits traditional group-based approaches to political representation by examining how multiple advantages and disadvantages interact and multiply in specific settings. The contributions examine how intersections of age, religion, gender, sexuality, ability, nationality, generation and ethnicity influence entrance to elected office and the power elected officials eventually wield. We propose a new intersectional framework for studying the mechanisms that lead to inclusion (advantage) and exclusion (disadvantage) in political representation, and find that (1) similar mechanisms produce different outcomes for different (sub)groups in society, and (2) the effect of identity mixes is contextual and differs across dimensions of representation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mügge et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: