Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Differences in values reported from each paper reflect variations in cancer site, disease stages, study population, treatment modality/setting and utility elicitation methods used. As patient management changes over time, corresponding effects on both costs and utility need to be considered to ensure health economic assumptions are up-to-date and closely reflect the case mix of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ong et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: