Why the study?
Bioresorbable scaffolds provide transient vessel support without the long-term limitations of permanent metallic DES, warranting an overview of clinical efficacy, safety, and development of the Magmaris resorbable magnesium scaffold.
Is the Magmaris resorbable magnesium scaffold safe and effective for the treatment of coronary heart disease?
Is the Magmaris resorbable magnesium scaffold safe and effective for the treatment of coronary heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Magmaris resorbable magnesium scaffold shows promising early safety and efficacy for simple coronary artery disease, offering transient vessel support without permanent caging.
Introduction: Bioresorbable scaffold technology provides transient vessel support with drug-delivery capability without the long-term limitations of the permanent metallic drug-eluting stents (DES). The technology has the potential to overcome many of the safety concerns associated with metallic DES, such as hypersensitivity reactions, late stent thrombosis and progression of atherosclerosis within the stented segment (i.e. neoatherosclerosis). Areas covered: The sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold Magmaris is the only metallic CE-marked resorbable scaffold currently available. This magnesium scaffold is designed for providing a short-term lumen support (up to 3 months) before being completely bioresorbed, eliminating the permanent caging typical of the metallic DES. This review will focus on the device development and characteristics, currently available clinical efficacy and safety data, and potential future perspectives. Expert opinion: The first clinical studies testing this device in a small number of patients have shown promising results with good clinical and safety outcomes up to 3 years' clinical follow-up, supporting the use of Magmaris in simple coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennett et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: