-E /*R. DAHL, in his incisive analysis of the | problems involved in creating a science of public administration, has raised three very fundamental issues.1 As he clearly demonstrates, No science of public administration is possible unless: (i) the place of normative values is made clear; (2) the nature of man in the area of public administration is better understood and his conduct is more predictable; and (3) there is a body of comparative studies from which it may be possible to discover principles and generalities that transcend national boundaries and peculiar historical experiences.2 While I am in fundamental agreement with all three propositions, it appears to me that there is need for some qualification and elaboration of Mr. Dahl's discussion of the first two.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herbert A. Simon (1947) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: