Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The porous hydroxyapatite (HA) bioceramics were prepared through combination of sacrificial template and direct foaming techniques using PMMA granules (varied from 5 to 50wt% in content) as a template and H 2 O 2 solution (varied from 5 to 30wt% in concentration) as a foaming agent, respectively. The effects of PMMA content and H 2 O 2 concentration on final porosity, microstructure and mechanical strengths were studied. The porous samples using PMMA provided the porosity ranging from 52% to 75%, the samples using H 2 O 2 had the porosity ranging from 82% to 85%, and the sample using both pore formers provided the porosity ranging between 84% and 90%. The higher content of PMMA and concentration of H 2 O 2 led the porosity increased, leading to a decrease in the compressive and flexural strengths. Furthermore, this combination technique allowed interconnected pores having two levels of pore size, which came from PMMA and H 2 O 2 . The PMMA formed the small pores with the diameter ranging between 100 and 300 m, while H 2 O 2 provided the larger pores with the diameter ranging from 100 to 1,000 m depending on concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woottichaiwat et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: