Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 14, 2003HeartOpen Access

Myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known modalities for assessing myocardial reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Is myocardial contrast echocardiography superior to other modalities for assessing myocardial reperfusion and predicting left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction?

Population

Patients with acute myocardial infarction

Comparison

Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) vs Other known modalities

Design

Review

Follow-up

1 month

Authors

KGKim GreavesSDSimon DixonMFMartin Fejka

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

MCE may refine post-MI reperfusion assessment; leaves open prospective validation of superiority and outcome impact.

Structured PICO

Is myocardial contrast echocardiography superior to other modalities for assessing myocardial reperfusion and predicting left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
Patients with acute myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE)
C
Comparator
Other known modalities
O
Outcome
Assessment of myocardial reperfusion at a microvascular level and prediction of left ventricular function at one monthsurrogate

Myocardial contrast echocardiography is highlighted as the most accurate modality for assessing microvascular reperfusion and predicting short-term left ventricular function post-myocardial infarction.

Cite This Study

Greaves et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd66e226032fe00d100f7ahttps://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.2.139
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share