This paper contains the results of a combined laboratory and field demonstration project exploring the use of dredged material (DM) blended with steel slag fines [SSF; 9.5 mm (3/8 in.) minus] as synthetic fill materials. The granular nature [a well graded sand (SW) soil], mineralogy, reactivity, and residual lime content of the SSF media make it well suited for blending with DM high-plasticity organic (OH) soil, so that geotechnical and environmental soil improvement occur simultaneously with one amendment. The source materials (100% DM, 100% SSF) were evaluated along with 80/20, 60/40, 50/50, 40/60, and 20/80 DM-SSF blends (dry weight basis), where the DM content is reported first. Key findings include that the 100% DM had a ϕCIU¯′ of 27.3°, which increased to a peak ϕCIU¯′ value of 45° for the 50/50 DM-SSF blend. The hydraulic conductivity (k) of the 100% DM (10-8 cm/s) remained relatively constant until SSF content reached 80%, where an abrupt increase to 10-5 cm/s was observed. The field demonstration project confirmed that the DM-SSF blends could be easily blended to within ±5% of their target DM content. Trial highway embankments were constructed with 100% DM, 100% SSF, and the 80/20, 50/50, and 20/80 DM-SSF blends to modified Proctor compaction goals ranging from 85 to 95% relative compaction on the maximum dry unit weight, depending on the blend. The average cone penetration test (CPT) tip resistance for 100% DM and 100% SSF media were approximately 1.3 and 57.3 MPa, respectively. The compacted 80/20, 50/50, and 20/80 DM-SSF blend embankments were generally characterized by average CPT tip resistances on the order of 2.9, 6.2, and 11.6 MPa, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malasavage et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: