Why the study?
Does the "multiple acquisition" method agree with the "difference method" for evaluating SNR performance in parallel cardiac imaging?
Does the "multiple acquisition" method agree with the "difference method" for evaluating SNR performance in parallel cardiac imaging?
The study demonstrates two practical methods for evaluating SNR in parallel cardiac imaging, identifying an optimal acceleration factor of 4 for high-resolution CINE SSFP imaging.
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports SNR evaluation methods in parallel cardiac MRI; leaves open translation of acceleration factor 4 to routine practice.
Reeder et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: