One of the key findings of this analysis is that manufacturers tend to implement changes to the development programme based on both regulatory and HTA advice with regards to the choice of primary endpoint and comparator. It also confirms the challenging choice of the study comparator, for which manufacturers seem to be more inclined to satisfy the regulatory advice. Continuous research efforts in this area are of paramount importance from a public health perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tafuri et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: