The non-identity problem concerns actions that affect who exists in the future. If such an action is performed, certain people will exist in the future who would not otherwise have existed: they are not identical to any of the people who would have existed if the action had not been performed. Some of these actions seem to be wrong, and they seem to be wrong in virtue of harming the very future individuals whose existence is dependent on their having been performed. The problem arises when it is argued that the actions do not harm these people—because the actions do not make them worse off than they would otherwise be.1 Consider: Radioactive Waste Policy: We are trying to decide whether to adopt a permis-sive radioactive waste policy. This policy would be less inconvenient to us than our existing practices. If we enact the newly-proposed policy, then we will cause there toberadioactivepollution thatwill cause illness and suffering. However, the policy will have such significant effects onpublic policy and industry
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizabeth Harman (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: