PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative seismic performance of steel EBF shear links frame designed to IS 18168:2023 using force-based and direct displacement method

BRBush RcVEVenkata Vamsi EmaniABAhmad Batah

Key Points

  • Evaluate the seismic performance of steel eccentrically braced frames designed using IS 18168:2023 under different design methods.
  • Conducted nonlinear static pushover analysis of various EBF building heights (3, 6, 9, and 12 storeys).
  • Performed nonlinear time-history analysis and incremental dynamic analysis.
  • Examined response parameters such as inter-storey drift, link rotation, and plastic hinge distribution.
  • DDBD showed 20-40% lower median drift demands compared to FBD.
  • Notable 30-50% reduction in critical link rotation at MCE level with DDBD.
  • DDBD frames exhibited improved collapse robustness and delayed drift escalation, especially in mid to high-rise buildings.

Abstract

The recent introduction of IS 18168:2023 marks a significant advancement in the seismic design of steel structures in India by providing dedicated provisions for eccentrically braced frames (EBFs). While the code promotes link-controlled energy dissipation, its performance under different design philosophies, particularly in the nonlinear range, remains largely unexplored. This study presents a comprehensive seismic performance evaluation of steel EBF buildings designed as per IS 18168:2023 using conventional Force-Based Design (FBD) and Direct Displacement-Based Design (DDBD) approaches. The nonlinear static pushover analysis, nonlinear time-history analysis, and incremental dynamic analysis are performed for four building heights of 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-storey. In addition, various important response parameters, including inter-storey drift, link rotation, plastic hinge distribution, variability, and collapse-related behaviour, have been systematically examined. Based on the results, it has been confirmed that EBF systems designed according to IS 18,168 exhibit a stable and desirable seismic behaviour, with inelastic deformation pretty much localized in the shear links. With respect to FBD, however, DDBD provides stronger control over nonlinear response due to approximately 20–40% lower median drift demands, 30–50% reduction at critical link rotation in MCE level, and strongly reduced record-to-record variability. Further, the drift escalation in DDBD frames is delayed while collapse robustness is notably improved, particularly for the midand high-rise buildings. Overall, the study brings out that though IS 18,168 provides a robust codal framework in the design of EBF systems, integrating DDBD within this codal context further leads to a more realistic, predictable, and performanceoriented seismic response, especially under strong ground motions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rc et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd8eee195c95cdefd6794https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47433-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper