Mendelian randomization analysis finds that genetic factors for smoking increase carpal tunnel syndrome risk, suggesting smoking cessation is crucial.
• Genetics establishes smoking as a cause of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. • Genetic predisposition to smoking raises the risk of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. • Finding is robust to genetic confounding. • Quitting smoking is key to preventing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a common entrapment neuropathy leading to pain and functional impairment. While smoking has been proposed as a modifiable risk factor, evidence from observational studies remains inconsistent due to potential confounding and reverse causality. The authors performed a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to assess the causal relationship. Genetic instruments for five smoking phenotypes were derived from large-scale Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Summary-level data for CTS were obtained from the FinnGen Consortium (n = 480,201). The Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method was the primary analysis, supplemented by four other MR methods and a suite of sensitivity analyses to assess robustness and pleiotropy. Genetically predicted smoking propensity was associated with a higher risk of CTS. Specifically, genetic predisposition to smoking initiation (ORMR-IVW = 1.53; 95% CI 1.33–1.76; p < 0.001) and heavier cigarette consumption (ORMR-IVW = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.31–1.77; p < 0.001) significantly increased CTS risk. The estimate for current smoking was particularly strong (ORMR-IVW=3.96; 95% CI 2.20–7.12; p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses were largely consistent, though some heterogeneity and potential pleiotropy were detected for specific phenotypes. This MR study supports a causal role of smoking in the development of CTS. These findings underscore the importance of smoking cessation as a potential preventive measure against CTS and should be integrated into patient counseling and public health strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: