PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026Annals of Surgical Oncology0 citationsOpen Access

Improved Clinical Outcomes in Anastomotic Leak Management Using Preemptive Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy After Esophagectomy

JMJennifer MertenMKMarkus Karl KostkaCSCarsten Szardenings

Key Points

  • Evaluate the impact of preemptive endoscopic vacuum therapy on anastomotic leakage management after esophagectomy.
  • Retrospective cohort study of 116 esophageal cancer patients
  • Comparison of outcomes between those receiving preemptive EVT and those receiving therapeutic EVT
  • Analysis of leak severity, hospital metrics, and clinical outcomes
  • Patients receiving preemptive EVT had significantly less severe leaks (5.4% vs. 36.7%)
  • Lower need for intracavitary therapy in the pEVT group (43.4% vs. 67.9%)
  • Shorter ICU stays by 74.4% and hospital stays by 27.5% for the pEVT group
  • Overall healing rates were high (85% for pEVT and 80.4% for non-pEVT)

Abstract

Abstract Background Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most feared complications after esophagectomy. Preemptive endoscopic vacuum therapy (pEVT) has been proposed to support anastomotic healing, but robust clinical data remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the role of pEVT in the management of AL. Methods A retrospective cohort study analyzed 116 esophageal cancer patients who experienced AL after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between 2012 and 2023. The patients were categorized into two groups: those who received therapeutic EVT (tEVT) after AL diagnosis without prior pEVT and those who experienced AL despite receiving pEVT and subsequently required tEVT as well. Clinical outcomes, leak severity, and hospital metrics were compared with a focus on endoscopic management of AL. Results The patients in the pEVT group presented with significantly less severe leaks (ZACC grade II: 36.7% vs. 5.4%; p < 0.001), required less intracavitary therapy (43.4% vs. 67.9%; p = 0.027), and exhibited lower postoperative inflammation. Preemptive EVT was independently associated with favorable leak grading (odds ratio, 14.4; p = 0.004), a 69% reduced need for intracavitary treatment ( p = 0.027), and markedly shorter intensive care unit (ICU: −74.4%; p < 0.001) and hospital (−27.5%; p = 0.011) stays. The overall healing rate was high in both groups (pEVT: 85%; non-pEVT: 80.4%). Conclusions Preemptive EVT significantly reduces the clinical severity of AL and facilitates faster recovery by shortening ICU and hospital stays. These findings highlight its value as a preventive strategy for high-risk patients undergoing esophagectomy. Prospective studies are needed to validate these promising results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Merten et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd938e195c95cdefd68echttps://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19622-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper