PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026Linguistics Vanguard0 citations

Crisis managers, the disaster risk reduction agenda, and the human right to information: a case study of building translation capacity in Sierra Leone

View Full Paper
PMPious MannahJKJonas KnauerhaseCFChloe Franklin

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the impact of translation capacity on disaster risk communication in Sierra Leone.
  • Case study approach involving a crisis translation training project.
  • Stakeholder interviews conducted using semi-structured formats.
  • Participants recruited through snowball sampling methods.
  • Findings emphasize the necessity of language as a human right in risk communication.
  • A multilingual disaster risk reduction resource was created, enhancing accessibility.
  • The study recommends formalizing translation policies in crisis management.

Abstract

Abstract The multilingual population in Sierra Leone witnessed the devastating effects of linguistically and culturally inappropriate risk communication during the 2014 Ebola epidemic, when many residents coud not access critical information in a language they understood, contravening the 1948 UN Charter of Human Rights. The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) terminology aims to support global disaster risk reduction efforts, yet its availability in only six official UN languages limits accessibility. To strengthen Sierra Leone’s translation capacity and crisis preparedness, YMCA Sierra Leone and University College London launched a crisis translation training project in 2020. Crisis professionals translated the UNDRR terminology into Kono, Krio, Limba, Mende, and Themne, producing a multilingual disaster risk reduction resource. This paper examines the interactional dynamics among the project’s sponsors, participants, and the language experts that supported the quality assurance procedures. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders recruited through snowball sampling, we present preliminary findings. Results highlight the importance of framing language protection as a right-based approach to prevent discrimination and past failures. Recommended measures include formalizing translation and interpreting policies in crisis management, integrating multilingual training, expanding access to multilingual disaster risk reduction materials, and leveraging technology for real-time interpreting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mannah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd9f9e195c95cdefd762ehttps://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0224
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Disaster studies inside out2018 · 148 citations
  2. 2Linguistic human rights, past and present1995 · 118 citations
  3. 3Training citizen translators2018 · 45 citations
  4. 4Development NGOs and Languages2020 · 22 citations
  5. 5Are we learning the lessons of the Ebola outbreak?2016 · 10 citations