In the decade up to 2019, South Africa underwent what may reasonably be described as a structural change emergency. Aggregate annual labour productivity growth was negative on average across the decade; this was accounted for by negative or negligible efficiency gains within all major sectors, and by growth-reducing structural change overall. Growth-reducing structural change implies that labour moved on average from more-to-less productive sectors. The underwhelming structural change and sectoral productivity growth performance of South Africa in this period stand out when compared with earlier periods in post-apartheid South Africa and in international comparison with Africa and the BRICS. Since 2020, there are green shoots of recovery, implying that the structural change emergency may be over. Nevertheless, this recovery is both non-transformative and highly unbalanced sectorally, although it is quite balanced geographically across the provinces of South Africa. The recovery is driven entirely by productivity growth or labour reallocation within, and reallocation of labour towards, the services sector. Recent evidence in the academic literature suggests that services can drive rapid growth through structural transformation, but the current situation in South Africa where non-services sectors are still acting as a drag on growth remains clearly sub-optimal.
Hamilton et al. (Wed,) studied this question.