Why the study?
The study was conducted to validate primary care electronic medical record diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction and stroke and to estimate their population prevalence in adults.
Are diagnoses of AMI and stroke in primary care EMRs valid compared to clinical gold standards in people aged ≥18 years?
Are diagnoses of AMI and stroke in primary care EMRs valid compared to clinical gold standards in people aged ≥18 years?
Diagnoses of AMI and stroke in primary care EMRs have high sensitivity and specificity, validating their use as a reliable tool for epidemiological studies.
Supports reliability of primary care EMR diagnoses for AMI and stroke; leaves open broader generalizability for epidemiological use.
Objectives To validate the diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke recorded in electronic medical records (EMR) and to estimate the population prevalence of both diseases in people aged ≥18 years. Design Cross-sectional validation study. Setting 45 primary care centres. Participants Simple random sampling of diagnoses of AMI and stroke (International Classification of Primary Care-2 codes K75 and K90, respectively) registered by 55 physicians and random age-matched and sex-matched sampling of the records that included in primary care EMRs in Madrid (Spain). Primary and secondary outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and overall agreement were calculated using the kappa statistic. Applied gold standards were ECGs, brain imaging studies, hospital discharge reports, cardiology reports and neurology reports. In the case of AMI, the ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Expert Consensus Document was also used. Secondary outcomes were the estimated prevalence of both diseases considering the sensitivity and specificity obtained (true prevalence). Results The sensitivity of a diagnosis of AMI was 98.11% (95% CI, 96.29 to 99.03), and the specificity was 97.42% (95% CI, 95.44 to 98.55). The sensitivity of a diagnosis of stroke was 97.56% (95% CI, 95.56 to 98.68), and the specificity was 94.51% (95% CI, 91.96 to 96.28). No differences in the results were found after stratification by age and sex (both diseases). The prevalence of AMI and stroke was 1.38% and 1.27%, respectively. Conclusion The validation results show that diagnoses of AMI and stroke in primary care EMRs constitute a helpful tool in epidemiological studies. The prevalence of AMI and stroke was lower than 2% in the population aged over 18 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burgos‐Lunar et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: