This study aimed to assess agreement between patient and proxy assessment of patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) during the acute stroke phase and 6 months after hospital discharge. As part of an observational longitudinal study, 161 consecutive patients hospitalized after stroke and their caregivers (CGs) were monitored during acute stroke and 6 months after hospital discharge. Patient-CG agreement of health-related quality of life as assessed by the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) and Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form (SF-12) which comprises physical (PCS-12) and mental component summaries (MCS-12) was determined by comparison and correlation analyses. Complete data were available for 65 patients and CGs. Compared with acute stroke, there were improvements in GOHAI and SF-12 scores from patient's and CG's perspective at 6-month follow-up. Caregivers overestimated the impact of stroke on MCS-12 over a period of time (P < 0.01) and underestimated the impact on GOHAI during acute stroke (P < 0.001) and on PCS-12 6 months later (P < 0.05). Patient-CG agreement was substantial to excellent during acute stroke [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC 0.69-0.86)] and fair-to-moderate 6 months later (ICC 0.28-0.60). Agreement was adequate between patients' and CGs' assessment of patient OHRQoL during acute stroke but it was less reliable 6 months after hospital discharge. These findings suggest that proxy assessment of OHRQoL after stroke is effective in assessing stroke-related oral impairments that affect life quality without placing additional burden on stroke patients themselves to assess OHRQoL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGrath et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: