This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Inconsistencies exist across individual experiments investigating aberrant brain activity in UD and replication problems across previous neuroimaging meta-analyses. For individual experiments, these inconsistencies may relate to use of uncorrected inference procedures, differences in experimental design and contrasts, or heterogeneous clinical populations; meta-analytically, differences may be attributable to varying inclusion and exclusion criteria or rather liberal statistical inference approaches.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: