Why the study?
Automatic left ventricle segmentation in 2D echocardiography is challenging due to ill-defined borders and operator dependence, and standard U-net architectures ignore the contribution of all semantic strengths.
Does MFP-Unet improve left ventricle segmentation in 2D echocardiography compared to standard architectures?
Does MFP-Unet improve left ventricle segmentation in 2D echocardiography compared to standard architectures?
The proposed MFP-Unet architecture provides highly accurate, state-of-the-art automatic left ventricle segmentation in 2D echocardiography.
May enable automated LV segmentation in echocardiography; leaves open prospective validation vs standard architectures.
Segmentation of the Left ventricle (LV) is a crucial step for quantitative measurements such as area, volume, and ejection fraction. However, the automatic LV segmentation in 2D echocardiographic images is a challenging task due to ill-defined borders, and operator dependence issues (insufficient reproducibility). U-net, which is a well-known architecture in medical image segmentation, addressed this problem through an encoder-decoder path. Despite outstanding overall performance, U-net ignores the contribution of all semantic strengths in the segmentation procedure. In the present study, we have proposed a novel architecture to tackle this drawback. Feature maps in all levels of the decoder path of U-net are concatenated, their depths are equalized, and up-sampled to a fixed dimension. This stack of feature maps would be the input of the semantic segmentation layer. The proposed network yielded state-of-the-art results when comparing with results from U-net, dilated U-net, and deeplabv3, using the same dataset. An average Dice Metric (DM) of 0.945, Hausdorff Distance (HD) of 1.62, Jaccard Coefficient (JC) of 0.97, and Mean Absolute Distance (MAD) of 1.32 are achieved. The correlation graph, bland-altman analysis, and box plot showed a great agreement between automatic and manually calculated volume, area, and length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moradi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: