This paper takes a critical approach to understanding the social and cultural‘work’ of natural heritage conservation, focussing specifically on ex-situ cryopreservation practices. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork the Frozen Ark, a UK-based ‘frozen zoo’ aiming to preserve the DNA of animal species, the paper situates the development of nonhuman animal biobanks in relation to current anxieties regarding the loss of biodiversity. These developments are seeding new global by driving advances in technologies, techniques and practices of, de-extinction, re-wilding and potential species re-introduction. this provides impetus to rethink the nature of ‘nature’ itself, as something which is actively made by such conservation practices, we also aim to a contribution to the development of a series of critical concepts for of ex-situ and in-situ natural heritage preservation practices, which illuminates their roles in building distinctive futures, through discussion of the relationship between conservation proxies, biobanking and. We suggest that questions of value and the role of future in relation to heritage cannot be disassociated from an analysis of issues, and, therefore, the paper is framed within a broader of the place of ex-situ biodiversity cryopreservation in the late global economy
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breithoff et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: