Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The nutritional reformulation of processed food and beverage products has been promoted as an important means of addressing the nutritional imbalances in contemporary dietary patterns. The focus of most reformulation policies is the reduction in quantities of nutrients-to-limit – Na, free sugars, SFA, trans -fatty acids and total energy. The present commentary examines the limitations of what we refer to as ‘nutrients-to-limit reformulation’ policies and practices, particularly when applied to ultra-processed foods and drink products. Beyond these nutrients-to-limit, there are a range of other potentially harmful processed and industrially produced ingredients used in the production of ultra-processed products that are not usually removed during reformulation. The sources of nutrients-to-limit in these products may be replaced with other highly processed ingredients and additives, rather than with whole or minimally processed foods. Reformulation policies may also legitimise current levels of consumption of ultra-processed products in high-income countries and increased levels of consumption in emerging markets in the global South.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gyorgy Scrinis
The University of Melbourne
Carlos Augusto Monteiro
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Public Health Nutrition
The University of Melbourne
Universidade de São Paulo
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Scrinis et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69de81256e50a6aba3e9407a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980017001392
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: