Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Perspective reveals how eco-evolutionary theories improve synthetic microbial community efficacy in terrestrial ecosystems, highlighting pathways to overcome commercial and field performance barriers.
Use of synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) is a promising approach that harnesses nature-based solutions to support soil fertility and food security, mitigate climate change impacts, and restore terrestrial ecosystems. Several microbial products are in the market, and many others are at different stages of development and commercialization. Yet, we are still far from being able to fully harness the potential and successful applications of such biotechnological tools. The limited field efficiency and efficacy of SynComs have significantly constrained commercial opportunities, resulting in market growth falling below expectations. To overcome these challenges and manage expectations, it is critical to address current limitations, failures, and potential environmental consequences of SynComs. In this Viewpoint, we explore how using multiple eco-evolutionary theories can inform SynCom design and success. We further discuss the current status of SynComs and identify the next steps needed to develop and deploy the next generation of tools to boost their ability to support multiple ecosystem services, including food security and environmental sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delgado‐Baquerizo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: