The Potential of Asynchronous Video in Online Education

There are differences in the benefits that are afforded by the two extremes of face-to-face and distance education. University campus courses are based on the assumption that the student community and interaction between learners and an expert teacher in the same physical location is essential to the learning process. In comparison, distance education provides a learner with flexibility, individualized learning, lower costs, and self-determination in the learning process. Much research has been invested into modern approaches that may be able to harness key benefits from both face-to-face and distance education. One recent breakthrough has come in the use of asynchronous video in online classes at Brigham Young University (BYU). Early results have been promising in finding a way to bridge the gap between the two extremes of education. Using the frameworks of instructor immediacy and social presence, this article presents developments and findings from the study of two online classes in the School of Education at BYU, where asynchronous video has been developed as a central method for communication, assignments, and feedback.Some of the advantages of a face-to-face setting can be described in terms of the benefits of the close social interaction that exists in a classroom. Close social interaction between teacher and student, which is one important facet of the overall domain of social interaction, is often discussed in terms of instructor immediacy. Immediacy is defined as: 'those communication behaviors, some visual others vocal that enhance closeness to and non-verbal interaction with another' (Mebrabrian, 1969, p. 213). Rovai (2000) elaborates that instructor immediacy is the immediate verbal and non-verbal communications such as smiles, head nods, use of inclusive language, and eye contact that promote increased learning. Cutler (1995) describes immediacy in terms of a reciprocal process in which individuals are more likely to establish trust, seek support, and find satisfaction the more they know more about each other.Studies including Christophel (1990), and Christensen and Menzel (1998) suggest that improved instructor immediacy affects student motivation, which in turn improves student learning. These studies suggest that immediacy has an indirect rather than a direct impact on student learning, as it is in reality student motivation that directly impacts student learning. It is reasonable to assume that a high level of instructor immediacy would most likely have the lowest level of impact on students with naturally high levels of motivation. Frymier (1993) investigated the interaction of students' motivation to study and instructor immediacy in a traditional face-to-face learning environment. Her research concluded that students who began a course with low to moderate motivation to study had increased motivation to study after interacting with a highly immediate instructor, while students with a high level of motivation were unaffected by the high level of immediacy.With the evidence suggesting that close social interaction, or immediacy, between an instructor and a student is correlated to some degree with student motivation, especially for students who have a low to moderate natural level of motivation, there is a need to investigate the instructor immediacy limitations that exist in online learning. Online learning environments do not have the advantages of the close proximity and all of the sensory perspectives and perceptions that are available in that setting. Due to this dynamic, it could be argued that instructor immediacy, and hence increased motivation for non-highly-motivated students, is an unlikely product of a traditional online class.To emulate some of the advantages of face-to-face settings, many attempts have been made to use synchronous (live) video conferencing in online distance education. The rapid propagation of the Internet over the last decade has led to new opportunities for leveraging the potential of live video in online distance education settings. In North America, it is estimated that by 2007, 73.6% of the population had access to the Internet, which equates to a growth of 130% between 2000 and 2007 (http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats2.htm).Home computers and webcams are now relatively inexpensive products and it seems that the time is right to capitalize on the potential benefits of video conferencing. However, there are still several problems in the implementation of live video that need to be addressed. First, being required to join a live video conference removes the time flexibility benefit which is one of biggest attractions of distance education. Second, many different technical issues exist that make it difficult to guarantee a good quality experience for all participants. In any group of online distance learners there can be diverse Internet connection, personal computer hardware, software, and other setup problems that, added together, cause different learners at different times to have a poor quality experience or to miss the experience altogether.Another audiovisual technology that may be a part of the solution is asynchronous (prerecorded) video communication. Asynchronous video takes advantage of the same Internet infrastructure and personal computer availability as live video streaming, but does not suffer from the same problems. Video messages, or video clips of instruction, are recorded and then sent over the Internet, which means that if the Internet connection is slow, then it will simply take longer to send, or can be re-sent later. As these video messages are recorded, the time flexibility benefit of online learning is retained, as an instructor or a student can record a video message at any time, and the receiver of the message can view it at any time according to his or her own schedule and availability. While these asynchronous video messages do not allow for spontaneous two-way discussion, they do convey many of the verbal and nonverbal elements associated with human face-to-face conversation.For the Winter 2008 semester, a request was made to develop an online version of a class in the School of Education at BYU. In this class, which is required for secondary teaching majors, preservice teachers learn how to implement technology in secondary education classrooms. It was decided to try piloting the use of asynchronous video as a central communications method in the online class. The idea for using asynchronous video originally came from the designer/instructor's experience networking with family members in other countries using asynchronous video, or video-mail, as it is sometimes referred to.In this first pilot class in winter 2008, each student was required to have a webcam and access to a computer and the Internet. On the first day of class, students met with the instructor in a lecture theatre to discuss the structure of the class and for the students to view and discuss a video presentation. This was the only time the class met together. The students were then required to go to the class Web site using the Internet and to follow the instructions on the site. The first thing that students were required to do was to watch a video clip in which the instructor introduced himself and then explained the goals and objectives of the class.As part of the first set of assignments the students were required to use webcams to record a clip to send to the instructor. In this clip, students were required to introduce themselves, describe something unique about themselves, and respond to a discussion question related to the assignments. Video clips were sent by each student to the instructor as attachments in an e-mail. On reception of each video clip sent by students, the instructor recorded a video clip of himself in which he responded to the personal introduction given by the student, expressed encouragement, and stressed that the he would do his best to help when needed, and finally gave some feedback on the student's response to the discussion question.At certain points in the semester, students watched video clips in which the instructor was shown presenting certain topics that were reinforced with diagrams and pictures mixed into the video clips. The class Web site included textual instructions on the requirements of assignments and, in most cases, screen capture video clips showing how to use the software applications that were used in the assignments. Several assignments required the students to record video clips of themselves explaining the rationale for their projects or responding to a discussion question.From time to time the instructor sent e-mails with encouragement and reminders, and several times the instructor sent these messages in the form of recorded video clips instead of textual messages. The students also sent e-mails to the instructor when they needed help with assignments or if they had any other questions. The instructor attempted to answer all e-mail questions by the end of the day in which they were received. The final class assignment required each student to send a video clip to the instructor answering several final exam questions and also giving general feedback on the class including saying what they would do differently if they were the instructor.Following the pilot, student perceptions and class artifacts were studied to see whether immediacy was established and to what degree and the results were very positive. From student comments and the scores from the student ratings system, it was obvious that the students were able to perceive the instructor and his personality very well through the use of asynchronous video. The class was rated higher in every element of the BYU student ratings system than any of the face-to-face sections of the same class, and the students submitted comments such as:Apart from the high level of immediacy as perceived by students, there were two other main benefits that surfaced during the study of the pilot. First, students were reporting that they had a closer connection to the instructor than in a face-to-face class and that they felt that they had received more individual attention and feedback than in a face-to-face class. Second, the instructor reported that there was a marked difference in the kind of responses students would give to assignments when they were required to present their response on a video clip in comparison to the responses to the same assignments that are normally in written format.The instructor reported that although there was a fair amount of extra work involved in the initial design and set up of the online class, the actual running of the class was no more difficult or burdensome than the face-to-face version. In terms of overall time commitment, the instructor stated that the online version of the class actually took less of his time, and that it changed the way he worked. He would read e-mails, watch video clips, and respond to individual students at various times of the day, including evenings and weekends, whenever he happened to be online. This is in comparison to the face-to-face class where he would store up assignments to grade at regular intervals. The instructor declared that this actually reduced stress as a large pile of work rarely accumulated. However, the instructor recognized that this pattern of flexibility suited him personally, but might not suit other instructors.The instructor stated that the video clip presentations by students were a better representation of their actual level of knowledge than the written assignments that are required in the face-to-face class. The instructor also reported that the responses contained more information, and that he was able to more accurately discern the knowledge and skills of the students due to the audio-visual cues inherent in a video clip presentation. The instructor also stated that they knew more about each individual student than he felt was possible in the face-to-face class setting, which meant that he was consequently more able to respond to the individual needs of each student. The instructor stated that he did not think that there were many benefits of the face-to-face class that were lacking in the online class, with the exception of the dynamic nature of class brainstorming that he stated was a helpful part of the learning process for the face-to-face students.Following the pilot, the method of using of asynchronous video was further developed, and another online class was implemented in fall 2008 in the School of Education. One major development since the initial pilot was a better and simpler use of technology. In the pilot, students recorded video clips on their computers, and then e-mailed the clips as attachments to the instructor. There were numerous issues to resolve using this method, as some students did not understand how to create smaller video files that could be e-mailed, or did not know where to find the video files to attach to e-mails. It was recognized that to be successful, technological barriers needed to be removed.Over the summer period, online tools were evaluated, including Web sites such as freegabmail.com, tokbox.com, and social networking tools such as Facebook. These Web sites allow users to create and upload video clips, and in most cases require no prior technical expertise. The Web sites control the webcam and upload clips automatically to their servers, thus removing most of the technical barriers that had been faced in the pilot. Tokbox.com was selected as an interim solution while a new Web site for class video blogs was developed by the BYU Center for Teaching and Learning, which became available a few weeks into the semester. There was a transition period when both tokbox.com and the class video blog Web site were used; for the second half of the semester, only the class video blog Web site was used. The class video blog Web site was as simple to use as tokbox.com and it linked to the BYU student database, which made it easier to create class groups. Additionally, the class video blog Web site allowed for group discussion blog pages for which the other Web sites such as tokbox.com do not have the functionality.In the fall 2008 online class, which was also taught by the designer-instructor of the original pilot, the pattern was similar to the winter 2008 class, except that there were more student assignments in the form of video clips. There was also more feedback from the instructor in the form of video clips. Following the experience of the pilot, the model for using asynchronous video was more fully developed and organized, and included two experimental video-based group assignments.With the implementation of Web sites that facilitate asynchronous video communication, the class was in general a smoother experience for students and instructors. The perceptions of students in the online class followed the same pattern as for the pilot, except in this case, the students had never met the instructor. Student comments related to immediacy include the following:In addition to reviewing student comments, four students from the online section were interviewed after the class had ended. The students met the instructor in person only when they came for interviews, at which point the instructor introduced them to the interviewer. Comments from the interviews confirm the high levels of immediacy achieved through the use of asynchronous video. When asked about how connected they felt to the instructor, students gave the following statements:The comments relating to connected-ness reveal perceptions of instructor immediacy and the capacity of asynchronous video to form close relationships in which participants know each other without any physical contact. As previously noted, high levels of immediacy have been shown to be correlated with increased levels of student motivation. When students were asked to comment on how the relationship with the instructor through asynchronous video had affected their motivation to perform well in the class, students made the following statements:Results from the pilot and the fall 2008 online class consistently show the same patterns of high levels of immediacy and closeness between students and instructors, which, according to the available data from student ratings and student interviews, has had a positive effect on student motivation.Close connection and interaction between students is another aspect of face-to-face classrooms that has not been so easy to implement in distance education. These interactions and connections in online student communities have been described in research as social presence. Social presence is one element of the well established community of inquiry which was as a way of the overall experience with the original of the and of online education. The main that were perceived as being elements of an The main are presence, teacher presence, and social presence. Social presence is defined by main communication, and group These are used to the quality of between students in a learning presence is further described of participants to with the community course of in a and develop relationships by way of their individual 2007, p. This is also described in the following Social as the of learners to themselves their personal and themselves as in a community of 2007, p. In the of and is a of social presence as described by and and research by and that is also a of social presence. to these of social presence the community of inquiry the of social presence in a traditional online setting is not easy to to the degree that can exist in a face-to-face setting due to the of verbal and nonverbal cues and the sensory perspectives and perceptions that exist in a close the online class in fall 2008, two group assignments were The introduction of these assignments was a first to the of asynchronous video to group this the first group assignment is as a and the second is as a the group students were into of or four group had own blog on the class Web site. student submitted two video clips to their group blog as part of the The of the discussion was First, students watched video clips showing how to use and how to create a then a video clip in which they described their first on how they might have secondary students use to enhance learning. each student had a video clip to the group blog the instructor a clip giving some each student was required to watch the clips by all students and the instructor on their group each student recorded another video clip in which they discussed the of every other student in their and at the end of the clip they stated how their own had finally each a based on their selected learning the group the group of all students in the class. The of discussion was how online blogs can be used to enhance student learning. The first student a video clip brainstorming an idea of how they might use a blog to help students The second student watched the first clip, and in their clip they on the in the first clip and then added something student watched the two most clips and on them both their own student was required to two comments, and students were not allowed to their second comment at had been since their first for most students, they were required to watch clips by four different a based on the social presence section of the community of inquiry 2007, p. to results from the from student ratings comments, and from student comments, a pattern reported that they had from each but that they did not form or form relationships with In terms of the social presence in the for the students who the rated while communication and group were more highly as shown in comments from interviews confirm this general related to how students from include the from interviews that to the of connections or a general of in other students, or problems with to know the other students in the include the following:In it is not that this pattern group assignments were to allow students to see each other and to to but assignment was to allow for direct and This was a major learning point from the fall 2008 online class. This experience such as how can asynchronous video be used in a way that for in assignments and that also the of and close relationships that are to their two online classes are being taught and studied during winter and group assignments have been to allow for increased of these developments will be as as instructor reported that the two group assignments were not to allow for a group of knowledge or any kind of However, the instructor that students did from each and that there were some benefits to the asynchronous group that were It is difficult to guarantee that each student in a face-to-face class can have a fair and in any group assignment as some students are naturally more than but in the asynchronous discussion, no student could and each was required to which also added individual The that every student was able and required to was by the instructor to be a positive to the asynchronous group study of the use of asynchronous video so has been to online and classes that are to students on the campus of BYU. It is by the and involved in these studies that the method of using asynchronous video as a of an online will be received and to learners who are at a distance and who distance education as their learning research and development is in a distance learning to these video, or video-mail, is not a new but it is a new that is being introduced to the developments in social networking have online tools that facilitate the use of asynchronous video webcam for studies in the School of Education at BYU suggest that asynchronous video has the capacity to the verbal and non-verbal in positive levels of immediacy and social presence that can be to students in regular face-to-face learning and at the same time the time and location flexibility benefits of distance studies have also shown that certain of student are but that more development and research is required to find to what elements of face-to-face can be using asynchronous video. In research is required to study the potential of asynchronous video to create a different of that is in that may only be in asynchronous settings. find answer to these an asynchronous video learning model is being developed at BYU, and on the development of this model is development is still in results from the study of online classes in the School of Education at BYU show that there is a high degree of in using asynchronous video to bridge the gap and the benefits of both face-to-face and distance learning