Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A good estimation of the b ‐value is crucial for the earthquake hazard assessment. Its evaluation can be strongly affected by an incorrect estimation of the completeness magnitude m c because a too small m c will reflect into a small b ‐value, whereas a too large m c will imply a larger standard deviation due to the reduction of the magnitude interval. Several methods for the estimation of m c exist, however its evaluation is very delicate and requires some critical decision making in most cases. Here we present a new, very rapid and simple method for m c estimation. It is based on the observation that the Gutenberg‐Richter distribution is an exponential one only for magnitudes larger than m c . As a consequence, the average magnitude m a value should increase linearly with a threshold magnitude m th . The departures from such linear behavior, allows a correct estimation of m c , whereas the linearity of the of m a versus m th allows a correct estimation of the b ‐value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godano et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: