January 1, 2015SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaOpen Access

Cost-effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume environments like cataract surgery

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

AAAbadanKhan AmitavaAligarh Muslim University AKAshiya KhanMcLaren Regional Medical Center SRSyed A. Q. RizviUniversity of Waterloo

Abstract

MSICS provides comparable visual and QALY improvement, yet takes less time, and is significantly more cost-effective, compared with PE. Greater push and penetration of MSICS, by the government, is justifiably warranted in our country.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Amitava et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de9861499d77a496b0bfa3 https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.162600

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Cost-effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume environments like cataract surgery

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Cost-effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume environments like cataract surgery

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider