Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper evaluates the prospects for application of the “grid/group” cultural theory ( CT ), as advanced by M ary D ouglas and A aron W ildavsky, to the A dvocacy C oalition T heory ( ACF ). CT would seem to be relevant to several key aspects of the ACF : the content of the core beliefs that provide the “glue” that binds coalitions; the resilience of core beliefs and associated implications for belief change and learning; and the structure of coalitions and the mechanisms for coordination and control within them. The paper considers the compatibility of the ACF 's account of deep core beliefs and coalition structure with that of CT ; surveys an array of empirical studies based on variations of CT ; and extends accounts of change in cultural identities from CT to the ACF . In addition, we highlight some of the ways in which the ACF may offer important theoretical insights for scholars of CT , potentially clarifying hypotheses concerning the relationships among basic worldviews, more specific beliefs, and behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenkins‐Smith et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: