Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 21, 2020SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaOpen Access

Loosening and revision rates after total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of cemented all-polyethylene glenoid and three modern designs of metal-backed glenoid

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DKDong Min KimTech University of KoreaMAMohammed AldeghaitherMcGill University Health CentreFAFahad Alabdullatif

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dea55c7702a00918b0c41bhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3135-6
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009 · 65,288 citations
  2. 2Long-Term Results of Cemented Metal-Backed Glenoid Components for Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder2009 · 95 citations
  3. 3Catastrophic failure of a low profile metal-backed glenoid component after total shoulder arthroplasty2015 · 17 citations
  4. 4Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with an All-Polyethylene Pegged Bone-Ingrowth Glenoid Component2012 · 123 citations