Why the study?
Telehealth interventions could potentially be offered to patients unable to attend cardiac rehabilitation or as an adjunct for effective secondary prevention.
Do telehealth interventions improve secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease?
Do telehealth interventions improve secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease?
Telehealth interventions may serve as an alternative or adjunct to traditional cardiac rehabilitation for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
Supports telehealth integration into cardiac rehab programs; extends meta-analytic evidence for secondary prevention in coronary heart disease.
Telehealth interventions with a range of delivery modes could be offered to patients who cannot attend cardiac rehabilitation, or as an adjunct to cardiac rehabilitation for effective secondary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: