PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 17, 2019204 citationsOpen Access

Melding the Data-Decisions Pipeline: Decision-Focused Learning for Combinatorial Optimization

BWBryan WilderBDBistra DilkinaMTMilind Tambe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Creating impact in real-world settings requires artificial intelligence techniques to span the full pipeline from data, to predictive models, to decisions. These components are typically approached separately: a machine learning model is first trained via a measure of predictive accuracy, and then its predictions are used as input into an optimization algorithm which produces a decision. However, the loss function used to train the model may easily be misaligned with the end goal, which is to make the best decisions possible. Hand-tuning the loss function to align with optimization is a difficult and error-prone process (which is often skipped entirely).We focus on combinatorial optimization problems and introduce a general framework for decision-focused learning, where the machine learning model is directly trained in conjunction with the optimization algorithm to produce highquality decisions. Technically, our contribution is a means of integrating common classes of discrete optimization problems into deep learning or other predictive models, which are typically trained via gradient descent. The main idea is to use a continuous relaxation of the discrete problem to propagate gradients through the optimization procedure. We instantiate this framework for two broad classes of combinatorial problems: linear programs and submodular maximization. Experimental results across a variety of domains show that decisionfocused learning often leads to improved optimization performance compared to traditional methods. We find that standard measures of accuracy are not a reliable proxy for a predictive model’s utility in optimization, and our method’s ability to specify the true goal as the model’s training objective yields substantial dividends across a range of decision problems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilder et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dea6fa6bae133e7de947achttps://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011658
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Generic Methods for Optimization-Based Modeling2012 · 205 citations
  2. 2Submodular meets Structured: Finding Diverse Subsets in Exponentially-Large Structured Item Sets2014 · 27 citations
  3. 3The Offset Tree for Learning with Partial Labels2008 · 9 citations
  4. 4Submodular meets Structured: Finding Diverse Subsets in Exponentially-Large Structured Item Sets2014 · 29 citations
  5. 5Beware the Soothsayer: From Attack Prediction Accuracy to Predictive Reliability in Security Games2015 · 13 citations