PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2000Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics553 citations

Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations

View Full Paper
DRDavid W. RitchieGKGraham J. Kemp

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a new computational method for protein docking that enhances the search for low-energy conformations.
  • Utilized spherical polar Fourier correlations for effective protein docking.
  • Implemented a hydrophobic excluded volume model and soft electrostatic complementarity.
  • Evaluated performance on various protein complexes with trial orientations exceeding 5 x 10(8).
  • Successfully identified the correct conformation for many domain dimer and enzyme-inhibitor complexes.
  • Achieved a good docking orientation ranked within the top 20 in 11 out of 18 cases using unbound subunits.
  • Reduced computation time for global search to 2 hours and local search to a few minutes.

Abstract

We present a new computational method of docking pairs of proteins by using spherical polar Fourier correlations to accelerate the search for candidate low-energy conformations. Interaction energies are estimated using a hydrophobic excluded volume model derived from the notion of "overlapping surface skins," augmented by a rigorous but "soft" model of electrostatic complementarity. This approach has several advantages over former three-dimensional grid-based fast Fourier transform (FFT) docking correlation methods even though there is no analogue to the FFT in a spherical polar representation. For example, a complete search over all six rigid-body degrees of freedom can be performed by rotating and translating only the initial expansion coefficients, many unfeasible orientations may be eliminated rapidly using only low-resolution terms, and the correlations are easily localized around known binding epitopes when this knowledge is available. Typical execution times on a single processor workstation range from 2 hours for a global search (5 x 10(8) trial orientations) to a few minutes for a local search (over 6 x 10(7) orientations). The method is illustrated with several domain dimer and enzyme-inhibitor complexes and 20 large antibody-antigen complexes, using both the bound and (when available) unbound subunits. The correct conformation of the complex is frequently identified when docking bound subunits, and a good docking orientation is ranked within the top 20 in 11 out of 18 cases when starting from unbound subunits. Proteins 2000;39:178-194.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ritchie et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69deabac077ec87fd1e93db8https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000501)39:2<178::aid-prot8>3.0.co;2-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantum Chemistry-Based Protein–Protein Docking without Empirical Parameters2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Sub-Angstrom Molecular Docking via Exhaustive Grid Search and Numerical Gradient Refinement: Inspired by the Rubik's Cube Combinatorial Structure2026
  3. 3Revisiting Protein–Protein Docking: A Systematic Evaluation Framework2025
  4. 4Integrating Quantum Mechanics into Protein-Ligand Docking: Toward Higher Accuracy and Reliability2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Unified Sampling and Ranking for Protein Docking With <scp>DFMDock</scp>2026