PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 3, 2003The Journal of Physiology314 citationsOpen Access

Distinct repriming and closed-state inactivation kinetics of Nav1.6 and Nav1.7 sodium channels in mouse spinal sensory neurons

View Full Paper
RHRaimund I. HerzogTCTheodore CumminsFGFarshid Ghassemi

Structured PICO

P
Population
Mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons expressing recombinant Nav1.6 and Nav1.7 channels
I
Intervention
Expression of Nav1.6 channels
C
Comparator
Expression of Nav1.7 channels
O
Outcome
Repriming (recovery from inactivation) kinetics and closed-state inactivation kineticssurrogate

Nav1.6 channels exhibit significantly faster repriming and closed-state inactivation kinetics compared to Nav1.7 channels, suggesting that differential expression of these isoforms tunes the firing properties of DRG neurons.

Abstract

While large, myelinated dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons are capable of firing at high frequencies, small unmyelinated DRG neurons typically display much lower maximum firing frequencies. However, the molecular basis for this difference has not been delineated. Because the sodium currents in large DRG neurons exhibit rapid repriming (recovery from inactivation) kinetics and the sodium currents in small DRG neurons exhibit predominantly slow repriming kinetics, it has been proposed that differences in sodium channels might contribute to the determination of repetitive firing properties in DRG neurons. A recent study demonstrated that Nav1.7 expression is negatively correlated with conduction velocity and DRG cell size, while the Nav1.6 voltage-gated sodium channel has been implicated as the predominant isoform present at nodes of Ranvier of myelinated fibres. Therefore we characterized and compared the functional properties, including repriming, of recombinant Nav1.6 and Nav1.7 channels expressed in mouse DRG neurons. Both Nav1.6 and Nav1.7 channels generated fast-activating and fast-inactivating currents. However recovery from inactivation was significantly faster (approximately 5-fold at -70 mV) for Nav1.6 currents than for Nav1.7 currents. The recovery from inactivation of Nav1.6 channels was also much faster than that of native tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium currents recorded from small spinal sensory neurons, but similar to that of tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium currents recorded from large spinal sensory neurons. Development of closed-state inactivation was also much faster for Nav1.6 currents than for Nav1.7 currents. Our results indicate that the firing properties of DRG neurons can be tuned by regulating expression of different sodium channel isoforms that have distinct repriming and closed-state inactivation kinetics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Herzog et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69deb7d27702a00918b0c91dhttps://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.047357
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nav1.3 Sodium Channels: Rapid Repriming and Slow Closed-State Inactivation Display Quantitative Differences after Expression in a Mammalian Cell Line and in Spinal Sensory Neurons2001 · 319 citations
  2. 2Sodium Channel Expression: A Dynamic Process in Neurons and Non-Neuronal Cells1996 · 54 citations
  3. 3Density of sodium channels in mammalian myelinated nerve fibers and nature of the axonal membrane under the myelin sheath.1977 · 352 citations
  4. 4Optimized protocol for biolistic transfection of brain slices and dissociated cultured neurons with a hand-held gene gun1999 · 70 citations
  5. 5GATA-3 Is Involved in the Development of Serotonergic Neurons in the Caudal Raphe Nuclei1999 · 415 citations